Commit Graph
6 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Stefan Lazic 973187dcc7 Multi-administrator support
CI / ci (push) Canceled after 0s
1. Summary of changes
The installer-created account is no longer special. "Owner" is now literally renamed Administrator and behaves exactly like the existing role/permission system already allowed — the codebase turned out to already define "administrator" structurally (a StaffProfile whose role holds MANAGE_STAFF), not as a name or a business.ownerId-style field, and last-administrator protection already existed. The real work was: closing the gap between that and a full admin-management UI, fixing two OTP-migration bugs the new spec's requirements exposed, and making the existing protection transactional.

Businesses can now have any number of Administrators, added via Invite Administrator (name + email → OTP-verified before access), promoted/demoted via the existing staff role dropdown (now intercepted with a confirmation dialog when it crosses the Administrator boundary), or removed via the existing deactivate flow.
Two real bugs found and fixed, both required for the spec's "unverified email must not get access":
Invitation acceptance (/invite/accept) never actually verified an OTP — it silently relied on a sign-in path that would have failed for every real invitee. It now sends and verifies a real code, reusing the shared OtpCodeStep UI.
A newly-invited (not-yet-accepted) account could sign in via plain email OTP before ever touching the invite link, because sign-in only checked "does a User row exist," not whether it was verified. Fixed in the shared OTP service, benefiting every invitation, not just administrators'.
Last-administrator protection (already existed) is now transactional — a SELECT ... FOR UPDATE lock on the business row closes the race where two concurrent removals of two different administrators could both succeed.
Administrators (any staff member, in fact) can now change their own email — new address must be OTP-verified before it replaces the login email.
No hidden installer privilege: confirmed via code audit and a live install → the account is a plain Administrator-role staff member, provable identically via the Team UI as any later-added one.
NextChair Manager and platform Super Administrator are untouched.
2. Prisma/database changes
No schema changes. One data-only migration: prisma/migrations/20260905214944_administrator_role_rename — UPDATE Role SET name = 'Administrator' WHERE name = 'Owner' AND isSystem = true. Runs through the normal migration-deploy process; not something to run by hand.

3. How Administrator roles are represented
A per-business Role row named "Administrator" (was "Owner"), isSystem: true, holding every Permission — created identically at install and in dev seed data. This is what "Invite"/"Make Administrator" assign.
Whether a StaffProfile currently counts as an Administrator is permission-based (holds MANAGE_STAFF), not a name check — the same definition the codebase already used for last-owner protection (isStaffAdministrator in staff.service.ts). This is deliberately reused rather than introduced, and stays correct if a business ever gets a custom role that also grants MANAGE_STAFF.
No Business.adminId-style field anywhere — confirmed none existed before this work either.
4. How administrator invitations work
Reuses the existing StaffInvitation model and createStaffProfile/createInvitation machinery verbatim — a new inviteAdministratorAction just pre-selects the Administrator role and uses a minimal Name+Email form (invite-administrator-form.tsx). Acceptance (accept-invitation.ts) now requires a real OTP code sent to the invited email before the account activates — expiry (7 days), resend, and revoke are all the pre-existing invitation mechanics (revoke = the existing deactivate action, relabeled "Revoke Invitation" while pending).

5. How last-administrator protection is enforced
Server-side only, inside staff.service.ts's updateStaffAsOwner (role change) and deactivateStaff (remove), each wrapped in prisma.$transaction that first locks the business row (SELECT ... FOR UPDATE), then counts other active Administrators before allowing the change. Verified with a genuine concurrency test (two simultaneous removals against a 2-admin business) and manually in-browser (see below).

6. Installation flow changes
Only the role name and one line of wizard copy changed ("This becomes the first Administrator..."). No structural UX change — still collects name/email, verifies via OTP, creates/activates the account, assigns the role, exactly as before.

7. Files changed
New: the migration; email-change.service.ts + change-email.ts action + change-email-section.tsx; invite-administrator-form.tsx + add-administrator/page.tsx; 3 new integration test files.

Modified — core: staff.service.ts (transactional protection, isStaffAdministrator), staff-invitation.service.ts, otp.service.ts (onlyIfUserExists fix, email-change purpose), default-permissions.ts, permissions.ts, auth.ts (JWT email-refresh, simplified finalize path).

Modified — actions/UI: owner/actions/staff.ts, staff-detail-panel.tsx, team/page.tsx, add-staff-form.tsx, accept-invitation.ts/form/page, otp-code-step.tsx, profile-form.tsx, installer files, seed.ts, plus a terminology sweep ("owner" → "administrator" copy in breaks.ts/time-off.ts/staff-emails.ts/profile page).

8. Manual testing steps
Sign in as the seeded owner → /owner/team shows an Administrator badge and an "Invite Administrator" icon next to "+". Invite someone, accept via /invite/accept?token=... printed to the terminal (code also prints there) — they land signed in with full Manage access. Promote/demote any staff member via the role dropdown on their detail page — crossing the Administrator boundary shows a confirmation dialog. With only one Administrator left, attempting to demote or deactivate them shows "You can't remove the only administrator. Add another administrator first." Change your own email from Profile settings — the new address must be OTP-verified before it replaces the old one.

9. Deployment steps on the VPS
None beyond the normal deploy process — the migration is a standard Prisma migration that prisma migrate deploy (whatever already runs it there) will pick up automatically. No new environment variables. No changes to NextChair Manager or its authentication.

Verification performed: tsc/lint/unit — all clean; full test:integration — 219 passed (up from 207, all new); full test:e2e — same 36/37 as before this work (the 1 failure is a pre-existing, auth-unrelated flake unrelated to any of this); a full live manual pass covering every scenario above, including the last-administrator block and the email-change JWT-refresh behavior.
2026-09-05 23:32:54 +01:00
Stefan Lazic 2aa8405006 Revert "PHP Rebuild"
This reverts commit 2ef3654841.
2026-09-05 09:32:05 +01:00
Stefan Lazic 2ef3654841 PHP Rebuild
CI / ci (push) Canceled after 0s
Initial PHP rebuild of the app
2026-09-05 08:21:33 +01:00
Stefan Lazic 546613e677 Phase 7 2026-08-03 21:15:24 +01:00
Stefan Lazic ec5583f972 Phase 6
Owner Administration is complete. Summary of this final stretch of work:

Seed data extended with an inactive staff member, a pending invitation, a redeemed-reward fixture, a service with no eligible staff, and a future-appointment fixture for conflict testing — all idempotent, verified against the dev DB.

Testing brought to 179 unit / 86 integration / 27 E2E tests, all passing together on a freshly seeded, disposable Postgres:

Unit tests for every new pure validator (business hours, categories/services, booking rules, loyalty config, staff creation).
Integration tests covering opening-hours conflicts, last-owner protection, staff deactivation/eligibility conflicts, loyalty redemption's atomic race-guard, and owner-vs-barber/business-isolation authorization — all against a real Postgres.
12 new Playwright owner journeys, which surfaced and fixed two genuine issues along the way: a cookie-clearing race condition in the sign-out-mid-test flow (a real, reproducible timing bug, not just a test artifact), and confirmation that seed fixtures upserted by deterministic ID go stale once "today" has moved on — now handled defensively.
Desktop responsiveness: converted the single-column Business Details, Booking Rules, and Loyalty Configuration forms to a genuine two-column layout at the lg: breakpoint (verified via measured element positions, not just screenshots), confirmed mobile stacking is unaffected.

Final verification: clean tsc, eslint, and next build, plus the full three-suite run against one fresh database as the authoritative pass.
2026-08-03 12:56:55 +01:00
Stefan Lazic ffee9d6754 Phase 5
Phase 5 is complete. All 53 tasks are done, verified on a fresh database in a single clean run: **121 unit tests**, **55 integration tests**, and **15 E2E journeys** (6 Phase 4 + 9 new Phase 5) all passing, plus a clean `tsc`/`eslint`/`build`.

Summary of this final stretch:

- **Fixed a real bug**: `StaffService`'s break/time-off update/delete functions threw uncaught instead of failing gracefully on a permission mismatch — fixed with proper `PERMISSION_DENIED` handling, covered by new integration tests.
- **Built the remaining Phase 5 UI**: Breaks editor, Time Off editor, Barber Profile, and Notification Preferences — all wired to real services, no placeholders.
- **Extended seed data**: more customers, loyalty accounts/transactions/rewards, and appointments spanning every status today (anchored to real time so the "Current Appointment" priority logic is reliably exercised).
- **Found and fixed a second real bug live in the browser**: the Break/Time-Off edit sheets showed stale default values instead of the item being edited (a classic `useState`-doesn't-reinitialize-on-prop-change bug) — fixed with a `key` prop to force remount.
- **Wrote the full Phase 5 test suite**: unit tests for `selectCurrentAppointment` and all `StaffService` validators, integration tests for `LoyaltyService` and `StaffService` (including the permission-fix regression tests), and 9 new Playwright E2E journeys covering the brief's exact required list.
- **Did the desktop-responsive pass**: a persistent sidebar nav replacing the bottom bar at `lg:`, a genuine calendar+"Right Now" side-by-side split, and 2-column layouts for the clients list and customer details — addressing the brief's explicit "more than simple centering" requirement.
- **Wrote [docs/phase-5-summary.md](docs/phase-5-summary.md)** documenting everything above in full.

Nothing is committed — the whole session (Phases 2–5) sits uncommitted on top of the initial template commit, same as you left it. Let me know if you'd like me to commit, or if you want to move on to Phase 6.
2026-08-02 23:44:18 +01:00